Watch the English Version on YouTube in 10 parts

Du continent américain à l’Inde en passant par l’Europe, une enquête magistrale et alarmante sur la multinationale américaine qui commercialise 90 % des OGM dans le monde. La société Monsanto, multinationale américaine née en 1901 à Saint Louis, dans le Missouri, et d’abord spécialisée dans l’industrie chimique, est devenue en un peu plus d’un siècle le leader mondial des biotechnologies, en particulier sur le marché des organismes génétiquement modifiés (OGM). Elle détient les brevets de 90 % du maïs, du soja, du colza ou du coton transgéniques cultivés dans le monde. Par le biais de rachats successifs, elle est en train de devenir le premier semencier de la planète et, à terme, c’est la chaîne alimentaire tout entière qu’elle pourrait contrôler. Mais c’est d’abord avec le Round Up, son herbicide “total” (longtemps estampillé “biodégradable”) qu’elle a commencé, à partir de 1974, à conquérir le monde. On lui doit aussi des produits aussi variés que le terrible agent Orange, massivement déversé sur le Viêt-nam par l’armée américaine, les PCB (pyralène en France, interdit au début des années 80), l’aspartame ou les hormones de croissance (interdites en Europe et au Canada).

Monsanto, avertit Marie-Monique Robin, est l’une des entreprises “les plus controversées de l’ère industrielle”


Orwellian Ubiquitous Computing

An “Everyware” world, as Adam Greenfield calls it, is a world in which computers are embedded and merged seamlessly everywhere in the environment. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags communicate their position and other information constantly in a vast network. Everyday objects become “searchable” as if they were part of the interconnected world wide web. In this interconnected internet of things, scientific management and surveillance of people and the environment we inhabit becomes possible, and marketers’ ultimate dreams come true.

Big Brother’s All-Seeing Eye


ENDGAME – Blueprint for Global Enslavement

Movie by Alex Jones (139 mins) WATCH FULL SCREEN ON GOOGLE VIDEO

They Want You Dead For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world’s population, while enabling the “elites” to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity’s extermination: Operation ENDGAME. Jones chronicles the history of the global elite’s bloody rise to power and reveals how they have funded dictators and financed the bloodiest wars—creating order out of chaos to pave the way for the first true world empire.

Watch as Jones and his team track the elusive Bilderberg Group to Ottawa and Istanbul to document their secret summits, allowing you to witness global kingpins setting the world’s agenda and instigating World War III.

Learn about the formation of the North America transportation control grid, which will end U.S. sovereignty forever. Discover how the practitioners of the pseudo-science eugenics have taken control of governments worldwide as a means to carry out depopulation. View the progress of the coming collapse of the United States and the formation of the North American Union.

Never before has a documentary assembled all the pieces of the globalists’ dark agenda. Endgame’s compelling look at past atrocities committed by those attempting to steer the future delivers information that the controlling media has meticulously censored for over 60 years. It fully reveals the elite’s program to dominate the earth and carry out the wicked plan in all of human history.

Endgame is not conspiracy theory, it is documented fact in the elite’s own words.


Secret Bush Administration Plan to Suspend US Constitution

Tom Burghardt Antifascist Calling… October 7, 2008

Ten months before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld approved an updated version of the U.S. Army’s secret operational Continuity of Government (COG) plans.

A draft document published by the whistleblowing website Wikileaks entitled, “Army Regulation 500-3, Emergency Employment of Army and Other Resources. Army Continuity of Operations (COOP) Program,” dated 19 January 2001, spells out changes in Army doctrine.

Issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army and signed off by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and the Secretary of the Army, the document is affixed with a warning: “Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.” The restricted document as published by Wikileaks states:

History. This regulation is a revision of the original regulation that was effective on 10 July 1989. Since that time, no changes have been published to amend the original.

Summary. This regulation on the Army Continuity of Operations (COOP) Program has been revised to update Army COOP policy and extend the requirement for all-hazards COOP planning to all Army organizations. Classified information contained in the 1989 version of this AR has been removed and placed in a classified HQDA Operations Plan (OPLAN).

Applicability. This regulation applies to the Active Army, the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and when federalized to the Army National Guard (ARNG). In the event of conflict between this regulation and approved OSD or JCS publications, the provisions of the latter will apply. (“Army Regulation 500-3, Emergency Employment of Army and Other Resources. Army Continuity of Operations (COOP) Program,” 19 January 2001, p. 3) [emphasis added]

“All-hazards COOP planning” is described as the means by which “the Army remains capable of continuing mission-essential operations during any situation, including military attack, terrorist activities, and natural or man-made disasters.” While the Army stresses the updates described in AR 500-3 relate to chemical, biological, nuclear attacks, “natural disasters” and “technical or man-made disasters or accidents,” current Army doctrine is also heavily weighted towards contingency planning for “civil disturbances.”

Two national “civil disturbance” plans, Garden Plot and Cable Splicer have been operational since the 1960s. Researcher Frank Morales has detailed how,

Under the heading of “civil disturbance planning,” the U.S. military is training troops and police to suppress democratic opposition in America. The master plan, Department of Defense Civil Disturbance Plan 55-2, is code-named, “Operation Garden Plot”. Originated in 1968, the “operational plan” has been updated over the last three decades, most recently in 1991, and was activated during the Los Angeles “riots” of 1992, and more than likely during the recent anti-WTO “Battle in Seattle.” …

Equipped with flexible “military operations in urban terrain” and “operations other than war” doctrine, lethal and “less-than-lethal” high-tech weaponry, US “armed forces” and “elite” militarized police units are being trained to eradicate “disorder”, “disturbance” and “civil disobedience” in America. Further, it may very well be that police/military “civil disturbance” planning is the animating force and the overarching logic behind the incredible nationwide growth of police paramilitary units, a growth which coincidentally mirrors rising levels of police violence directed at the American people, particularly “non-white” poor and working people. (Frank Morales, “U.S. Military Civil Disturbance Planning: The War at Home,” in Police State America, ed. Tom Burghardt, Toronto/Montreal: Arm The Spirit/Solidarity, 2002, P. 59)

AR 500-3 should be viewed in this context. Plans for Continuity of Government have been in place since the 1950s. Originally conceived during the Cold War when fears of a nuclear strike envisaged by atomic war-gamers at the RAND Corporation, believed that an immobilization of government functions and a breakdown of civilian rule would follow a nuclear attack. But from their inception, COG planning has been shrouded in secrecy.

In addition to constructing nuclear-proof underground facilities where the civilian leadership could escape a decapitation strike, other COG provisions included a series of executive orders designating which officials would assume Cabinet-level posts and other Executive Branch positions. Officials so designated would constitute a “shadow government” should office holders be killed in an attack “or otherwise incapacitated.”

However, when these and other Pentagon “civil disturbance” plans surfaced in the 1980s during the Iran-Contra hearings, they were roundly criticized by members of Congress, civil liberties groups and the media before disappearing once again, down Orwell’s “memory hole.” The inherent dangers implicit in such plans are that unelected Executive Branch officers could assume the Presidency and other appointed offices subject neither to congressional scrutiny nor judicial oversight.

Exercising sweeping emergency powers buried within Presidential Decision Directives (PDDs), unelected officials could suspend the Constitution, declare martial law and create an Executive Branch dictatorship that rests solely on the power of the U.S. military.

Most troubling, Executive Branch officials under secret rules of a COG regime could suppress and usurp the lawful powers of Congress and the Judicial Branch (by force of arms if deemed necessary) as a means of ensuring “cooperation” under a “unitary executive.”

As we have seen, the “unitary executive” theory has been a salient feature of Bushist rule since the December 2000 judicial coup d’état, when the Supreme Court’s Bush v. Gore decision handed a contested election to George W. Bush by stopping the vote count in Florida.

Since assuming office, the administration has ruthlessly wielded executive power in order to achieve their antidemocratic agenda: from the looting of the economy through “deregulation,” massive deficit spending and tax cuts for their corporate “clients,” to waging a preemptive war of conquest in Iraq, the “unitary executive” has systematically shredded America’s constitutional system of checks and balances.

The Bush administration put COG plans into operation for the first time in U.S. history in the hours directly following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. They have never been rescinded.

Their implementation involves a rotating staff of 75-150 senior government officials and others from every Cabinet department in two “secure, undisclosed locations” on the East Coast. However, key congressional representatives have been kept out of the loop and House and Senate leaders have said they were not informed the “shadow government” had “gone live.”

So secretive are Bush administration plans that Peter DeFazio (D-OR), a member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, was denied access in 2007 to the classified version of the COG plans contained in top secret Presidential Decision Directive annexes. This too, is unprecedented.

While the Bush administration admitted that COG was activated in 2001, their disclosure came only after The Washington Post broke the story based on confidential administration sources troubled by the scope of the program and its secretive implementation.

Since the late 1980s, Rumsfeld was a habitué of COG exercises along with Vice President Dick Cheney. Indeed early COG drills had been organized by the right-wing Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). As investigative journalist Andrew Cockburn revealed in his definitive political biography of the former Defense Secretary:

This highly secret program was known as Project 908, and among the individuals earmarked to take power when disaster struck was Donald Rumsfeld. … There, for several days, he would be immured in artificial caverns, staring at electronic displays streaming data of disaster and confusion, sleeping on cots and subsisting on the most austere rations. …

Insofar as the COG games gave the illusion of reality, they taught Rumsfeld and his fellow players some dangerous lessons, particularly when the fall of the Soviet Union induced some changes in the usual scenarios. Although the exercises continued, still budgeted at over $200 million in the Clinton era, the vanished Soviets were now customarily replaced by terrorists. The terrorism envisaged however, was almost always state-sponsored. …

There were other changes, too. In earlier times the specialists selected to run the “shadow government” had been drawn from across the political spectrum, Democrats and Republicans alike. But now, down in the bunkers, Rumsfeld found himself in politically congenial company, the players’ roster being filled almost exclusively with Republican hawks. (Andrew Cockburn, Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy, New York: Scribner, 2007, pp. 85-86, 88)

As researcher Peter Dale Scott revealed, in early 2006 the Department of Homeland Security awarded a $385 million contract to a Halliburton subsidiary, KBR, to provide “temporary detention and processing facilities.” Scott wrote,

The contract–announced Jan. 24 by the engineering and construction firm KBR–calls for preparing for “an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support the rapid development of new programs” in the event of other emergencies, such as “a natural disaster.” The release offered no details about where Halliburton was to build these facilities, or when. …

After 9/11, new martial law plans began to surface similar to those of FEMA in the 1980s. In January 2002 the Pentagon submitted a proposal for deploying troops on American streets. One month later John Brinkerhoff, the author of the 1982 FEMA memo, published an article arguing for the legality of using U.S. troops for purposes of domestic security. (Peter Dale Scott, “Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps,” Pacific News Service, February 8, 2006)

The DHS contract to KBR had been preceded by the April 2002 creation of the Pentagon’s Northern Command (NORTHCOM), specifically empowered by the Bush administration for domestic U.S. military operations in direct violation of Posse Comitatus prohibitions forbidding the use of the military for domestic law enforcement. At the time, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld called NORTHCOM’s launch “the most sweeping set of changes since the unified command system was set up in 1946.”

Sweeping indeed! Last month Army Times reported that the Army’s “3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team [BCT] has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys. Now they’re training for the same mission–with a twist–at home.” According to Army Times,

Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks. …

But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities. …

They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack. …

The 1st BCT’s soldiers also will learn how to use “the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded,” 1st BCT commander Col. Roger Cloutier said, referring to crowd and traffic control equipment and nonlethal weapons designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.

“It’s a new modular package of nonlethal capabilities that they’re fielding. They’ve been using pieces of it in Iraq, but this is the first time that these modules were consolidated and this package fielded, and because of this mission we’re undertaking we were the first to get it.”

The package includes equipment to stand up a hasty road block; spike strips for slowing, stopping or controlling traffic; shields and batons; and, beanbag bullets. (Gina Cavallaro, “Brigade Homeland Tours Start Oct. 1,” Army Times, September 8, 2008)

While senior Pentagon brass have downplayed the significance of deploying a BCT that has taken part in aggressive occupation duties to suppress the Iraqi people’s resistance, Col. Lou Vogler, NORTHCOM’s chief of future operations said in an interview that the military “will integrate with law enforcement to understand the situation and make sure we’re aware of any threats.” An article published by the Army News Service disclosed,

During the exercise, commanders and staff of the force will train, rehearse and exercise–from academic classes to making decisions and executing orders–all to help prepare them for the mission they will assume on Oct. 1, said Vogler.

“It’s an opportunity for network building in an unprecedented assignment of forces,” said [Marine Corps Lt. Col.] Shores. “DOD always had allocated contingency sourced forces–but this is precedent-setting network building with the forces that we ultimately will go out and execute with. It’s an opportunity to get to know our forces, to see them in execution, to mission-orient them and be that much better–to be that much more responsive.”

One goal of the exercise is to exercise with partners from the civilian agencies they would support. To that end, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other interagency representatives are participating to ensure integration with civilian consequence managers who would lead a response, said Vogler.

“The overall federal response builds on the local and state response in accordance with the incident command system and existing plans and processes that are out there,” said Vogler. “The response force would supplement local efforts.” (“Consequence Management Response Force to join Army Northern Command,” Army News Service, September 15, 2008)

Vogler and Shores were discussing an exercise code-named Vibrant Response, that took place September 8-19 at Fort Stewart in Georgia. Three brigades form the core of NORTHCOM’s Consequence Management Response Force: the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Army Division; the 1st Medical Brigade, Fort Hood, Texas, and the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Bragg, North Carolina. All three units participated in Vibrant Response.

As researcher and analyst Michel Chossudovsky comments:

The BCT is an army combat unit designed to confront an enemy within a war theater.

With US forces overstretched in Iraq, why would the Pentagon decide to undertake this redeployment within the USA, barely one month before the presidential elections?

The new mission of the 1st Brigade on US soil is to participate in “defense” efforts as well as provide “support to civilian authorities”.

What is significant in this redeployment of a US infantry unit is the presumption that North America could, in the case of a national emergency, constitute a “war theater” thereby justifying the deployment of combat units.

The new skills to be imparted consist in training 1st BCT in repressing civil unrest, a task normally assumed by civilian law enforcement.

What we are dealing with is a militarization of civilian police activities in derogation of the Posse Comitatus Act. (“Pre-election Militarization of the North American Homeland. US Combat Troops in Iraq repatriated to ‘help with civil unrest’,” Global Research, September 26, 2008)

One scenario envisaged by Chossudovsky is that “civil unrest resulting from from the financial meltdown is a distinct possibility, given the broad impacts of financial collapse on lifelong savings, pension funds, homeownership, etc.”

One might reasonably inquire, what “precedent-setting network” does the Army have in mind that would “ensure integration” with “civilian agencies” such as FEMA (a branch of Homeland Security)? As the World Socialist Web Site reports:

It is noteworthy that the deployment of US combat troops “as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters”–in the words of the Army Times–coincides with the eruption of the greatest economic emergency and financial disaster since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Justified as a response to terrorist threats, the real source of the growing preparations for the use of US military force within America’s borders lies not in the events of September 11, 2001 or the danger that they will be repeated. Rather, the domestic mobilization of the armed forces is a response by the US ruling establishment to the growing threat to political stability. (Bill Van Auken, “Army deploys combat unit in U.S. for possible civil unrest,” World Socialist Web Site, 25 September 2008)

As the 2001 COOP planning document describes, a host of on-going Army plans and exercises have been revised by the Bush administration. In addition to Vibrant Response discussed above, they include: Plan EXCALIBUR, a COG Army training exercise; ADOBE, described by investigative journalist William M. Arkin as a “FEMA continuity of government special access program designation.” Arkin describes special access programs or SAPs as,

Classified research and development, acquisition program, operation, intelligence activity, or plan that is so sensitive or critical that the value of the information warrants enhanced protection beyond that normally provided for access to Confidential, Secret, or Top Secret information. (William M. Arkin, Code Names: Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs, and Operations in the 9/11 World, Hanover, NH: Steerforth Press, 2005, p. 598)

The impetus for revising Army COOP was, according to AR 500-3 primarily because,

The end of the Cold War and the breakup of the former Soviet Union significantly reduced the probability of a major nuclear attack on CONUS (Continental USA -ed.) but the probability of other threats has increased. Army organizations must be prepared for any contingency with a potential for interruption of normal operations. To emphasize that Army continuity of operations planning is now focused on the full all-hazards threat spectrum, the name “ASRRS” has been replaced by the more generic title “Continuity of Operations (COOP) Program.” (p. 13)

Towards this end, the Rumsfeld-era document states that the Army’s new “mission-critical” functions will be restructured so that, “Army COOP plans must ensure that the Army remains capable of continuing mission-essential operations during any situation, including military attack, terrorist activities, and natural or man-made disasters.” (p. 13) The Army, following various contingencies analyzed in the document will “coordinate with mission-essential external organizations and agencies.” (p. 14)

So sensitive are the political ramifications of these plans that under the heading, 3-12 Operational Security (OPSEC), the Army avers,

a. The success of COOP planning relies on denying access by unauthorized parties to information on COOP plans, procedures, capabilities and facilities.

b. Overhead imagery, signals intelligence, human sources, and exploitation of open literature during peacetime are threat capabilities used to gain knowledge of Army emergency plans, command and control systems, and facilities.

c. See Appendix B, Security Classification Guide, for guidance on the level of classification of COOP-related information. (COOP, op. cit., p. 20)

Appendix A of AR 500-3 lists relevant references for changes included in the COOP planning document. These include:

Section I
Required Publications

HQDA Operations Plan EXCALIBUR, 30 April 1999 (Being Revised)
HQDA Continuity of Operations Plan (cited in para 1-4.f)

Section II

Related Publications a related publication is merely a source of additional information. The user does not have to read it to understand this publication.

Executive Order 12656
National Security Emergency Preparedness (NSEP), 18 November 1988

DoD Directive (Dodd) 2000.12
DoD Antiterrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) Program, 13 April 1999

CJCSM 3410.01
Continuity of Operations Plan for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (COOP-CJCS), 1 March 1999

Executive Order 12787
Prescribing the Order of Succession of Officers to Act as Secretary of Defense, 31 December 1991

DoDD 3020.26
Continuity of Operations (COOP) Policy and Planning, 26 May 1995

DoD 3020.26P
Continuity of Operations Plan, 21 June 2000 (Classified SECRET)

DoDD 3020.36
Assignment of National Security Emergency Preparedness (NSEP) Responsibilities to DoD Components, 2 November 1988

DoDD 3025.15
Military Support to Civil Authorities (MSCA), 18 February 1997

The Federal Response Plan, April 1999

Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 67, (Top Secret) Enduring Constitutional Government (ECG) and Continuity of Government (COG) Operations, Oct 21, 1998

Federal Preparedness Circular 65, Federal Executive Branch Continuity of Operations, (COOP), July 26, 1999

As Peter Dale Scott reported in CounterPunch, apparently members of Congress are considered “unauthorized parties” to be denied access “to information on COOP plans, procedures, capabilities and facilities.” Congressman DeFazio had been denied access to the classified annexes of National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 51/HSPD 20) Scott wrote,

NSPD 51 contains “classified Continuity Annexes” which shall “be protected from unauthorized disclosure.” Congressman DeFazio twice requested to see these Annexes, the second time in a letter cosigned by House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson and Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Christopher Carney. It was these requests that the White House denied. …

DeFazio’s inability to get access to the NSPD Annexes is less than reassuring. If members of the Homeland Security Committee cannot enforce their right to read secret plans of the Executive Branch, then the systems of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution would seem to be failing.

To put it another way, if the White House is successful in frustrating DeFazio, then Continuity of Government planning has arguably already superseded the Constitution as a higher authority. (Peter Dale Scott, “The Showdown,” CounterPunch, March 31, 2008)

With the stunning revelations published by Wikileaks, it is abundantly clear that top Bush administration officials were busily revising Continuity of Government plans, including “civil disturbance” contingencies for suspending the Constitution and imposing martial law, long before the 9/11 attacks.

Since that fatal and tragic day seven long years ago, we have been told repeatedly by the government and their media sycophants that 9/11 was the day “when everything changed.”

We now know thanks to Wikileaks, that as with the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the unprecedented and lawless surveillance of Americans, the illegal detention and torture of prisoners of war, that Bush administration assertions are no more than a pack of murderous lies.

One fact is abundantly clear from the mass of conflicting evidence and assertions made by proponents of various theories surrounding the 9/11 events: AR 500-3 demonstrates that from the very first moments after being installed in office, the Bush regime was involved in a “controlled demolition” of the U.S. Constitution.

source: Anti Fascist Calling


 Dr Bill Deagle

24 September

An interesting 20 minute conversation with Dr Bill Deagle. MP3

23 September

A 42 minute telephone conversation with George Green, as a follow-up to the 2 September interview below. George discusses the collapse of the US economy, the consequences for US citizens, and the serious, imminent risk of war.

L’économie pour les nuls

Petite leçon d’économie pour les «archi nuls», par un non moins nul

Une crise boursière fait toujours se poser la question :
« Mais tout cet argent perdu par la bourse, que devient-il ? Où va-t-il ?».
C’est une bonne question, qui renvoie déjà à ce qui détermine la valeur des choses.
Une maison, un tableau, une action boursière… ont une valeur liée au coût de leur fabrication (elle-même liée aux mêmes critères), à la valeur de l’entreprise et à son bilan (les 2 sont liés aussi), et beaucoup de cette valeur est liée à la loi de l’offre et de la demande, dite « du marché », ainsi qu’à une part de « mode ».
Bref, la valeur des choses en argent, est très relative, suggestive et fluctuante, voire totalement abstraite, une question de convention en quelque sorte. Et l’argent qui leur est attaché est en fait virtuel, c’est encore plus évident pour les valeurs boursières. C’est vrai pour tout ce qui peut s’acheter, se monnayer.
Il n’en est pas de même pour les choses de la vie, de la nature.
Ainsi, la valeur que nous attribuons à la vue, à la possibilité de marcher, de respirer, à un instant de bonheur avec des amis, sa compagne (ou son compagnon), ses enfants… tout cela n’a pas de prix, dans tous les sens de l’expression, car ce qui constitue la vraie Vie, 100 % authentique, n’est pas monnayable (et ceux qui le croient, le paient très cher un jour ou l’autre…).
Mais revenons à l’argent.
Des gens créent, détiennent, gèrent et “distribuent” l’argent.
On les appelle des Grands banquiers.
Vous avez remarqué que toutes les bourses du monde sont collées à ce qui se passe aux USA, et que la « FED* » est au cœur de tout cela.
*La Réserve fédérale (Federal Reserve System), appelée souvent Federal Reserve ou Fed, c’est la banque centrale privée des Etats-Unis.
Elle a été créée par le Federal Reserve Act, dit aussi Owen-Glass Act. Les banques suivantes sont à l’origine de cette fondation :
Rothschild Bank of London ; Rothschild Bank of Berlin ; Warburg Bank of Hamburg ; Warburg Bank of Amsterdam ; Lazard Brothers of Paris, Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy ; Chase Manhattan Bank of New York ; Goldman, Sachs of New York ; Lehman Brothers of New York ; Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York.

Les petites mains : les Petits banquiers locaux :
Un Petit banquier collecte l’argent des gens qui en ont, pour le prêter à ceux qui n’en ont pas assez, et qui en ont besoin pour créer une activité.
Ce faisant, ceux qui empreintent, créent des richesses (et des intérêts), un argent qui retournera à la banque, la boucle est bouclée.
L’art d’un Petit banquier est donc de faire travailler les autres pour lui, c’est ce qu’il appelle avec un bel euphémisme :
« Faire travailler l’argent ».
Mais si les choses vont mal, qu’à force de faire n’importe quoi avec l’argent des autres (le nôtre), que le Petit banquier n’a plus d’argent à prêter, que se passe-t-il ?
C’est le cas aux USA.
C’est simple, souvenez-vous pour le Crédit Lyonnais, le Petit banquier se retourne alors vers l’Etat et son budget, les fonds publics,
c’est-à-dire encore nous, notre argent…
Un argent que l’Etat lui redonne volontiers puisque ceux qui tiennent l’Etat sont aux ordres du Grand banquier, et pour cause, c’est le Grand banquier qui a financé leur campagne électorale… démocratique…
Ils ne sont en place, eux et pas d’autres, que par le bon vouloir du Grand banquier, le vote n’étant qu’une… formalité pour gogos manipulés.
Le Petit banquier se retrouve donc réapprovisionné en fonds à prêter, en profitera pour racheter les actions et biens à bas prix, et cela peut repartir pour un tour. Aux contribuables de rembourser intérêts et capital au Grand banquier, via le budget de l’Etat…
C’est sans fin… merveilleux, non ?

PS : Petite précision pour les super archi nuls, dans « Grand banquier » dans le texte, il faut comprendre « maître du jeu » (comme « Rothschild », par exemple, et pour ne nommer personne…).
Idem pour les « élus »… on ne parle pas des conseillers municipaux !
Les plus serviles alimenteront tout de même un des viviers dans lequel seront puisés les futurs grands serviteurs de… “l’Etat”… et là, dans “Etat”, il faut comprendre « maîtres du jeu »…

Bon, c’est peut-être un peu simpliste et donc réducteur, mais dites-vous bien que dans le détail des dessous des pratiques bancaires, c’est encore beaucoup, beaucoup plus sordide…

Travaillez bien… et surtout, votez bien…

Les points sur les “i” :
L’émission de la monnaie est le monopole d’intérêts privés, Morgan, Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc., qui ont le contrôle des Réserves Monétaires mondiales, qu’il s’agisse de la Federal Reserve Bank of America (dite FED), de la Banque du Canada ou de la BCE.
Ils émettent de la monnaie fictive qui se résume à des créances alpha numériques sur un ordinateur, sans même avoir les réserves couvrant ces prêts. Ils vont jusqu’à faire l’économie des coûts d’imprimerie des billets. Par contre, ils réclament évidemment des intérêts eux sonnants et trébuchants aux Etats emprunteurs. Ils ont ainsi endetté les Etats avec des intérêts cumulés qui représentent jusqu’à 90% de la dette.

Ghislaine Saint Pierre Lanctôt est médecin et clinicienne québécoise, auteure des best-sellers “La Mafia Médicale”, “le Procès de la Mafia Médicale” et plus récemment du livre “Que diable suis-je venue faire sur cette terre ?”.

Un mandat d’arrestation a été prononcé le 3 mars 2008 pour défaut de comparaître à l’encontre de Ghislaine Lanctôt. Le 6 juin 2007, l’Agence du revenu du Canada avait signifié une sommation de comparaître le 18 juin 2007 en cour du Québec de Granby pour répondre à sept chefs d’accusation relatifs à l’impôt et pour omission de produire des déclarations de revenus.

« Jusqu’en 1994, j’ai accepté de payer les impôts pour l’entité fictive appelée “contribuable”, une corporation que le gouvernement a créée, qui lui appartient et qui porte le nom de LANCTOT, GHISLAINE. Je croyais contribuer ainsi au bien public et je le faisais avec entrain. Que s’est-il passé pour que je stoppe complètement cette pratique?

C’est par obéissance à mon “âme et conscience” que j’ai pris cette décision, depuis que je sais que :

1. Les impôts ne servent pas au bien public. Ils vont directement dans les coffres des banquiers internationaux – propriétaires de la Banque du Canada – qui les utilisent pour financer les armes et les guerres, entre autres…

2. La Banque du Canada n’appartient pas au Canada. Elle est un cartel de banques privées internationales qui créent la monnaie canadienne.
Ce pouvoir de création de la monnaie était exclusif au gouvernement canadien. Il l’a cédé à la Banque du Canada en 1913. Depuis lors, le gouvernement emprunte (avec intérêt composé) de l’argent qu’il pouvait créer lui-même, sans coûts. C’est ainsi qu’une dette s’est constituée et que le peuple, les “contribuables” donnés en garantie, se saignent à blanc pour en payer uniquement les intérêts.

3. Les services fournis par le gouvernement ne sont pas payés par les impôts. Ils sont financés à même de nouveaux emprunts encourus régulièrement. D’où la croissance constante de l’inflation et de la dette – capital et intérêts -.

4. La dette est fictive, virtuelle. C’est une fausse dette. Aucun argent n’a été prêté par les banquiers propriétaires de la Banque du Canada. Ce sont des écritures sans aucune réserve qui sont enregistrées et utilisées. C’est de l’argent fictif, créé à partir de rien. Il n’y a pas de vraie dette !

5. Les impôts sont à contribution volontaire pour les particuliers. Il n’y a pas de loi qui impose aux femmes et aux hommes vivants – des êtres humains en chair et en os – de payer l’impôt sur leurs revenus. Seules les corporations – des personnes fictives – sont tenues de payer l’impôt sur leurs profits (revenus moins dépenses).

– Je me fais complice de tromperie et escroquerie publiques.
– Je participe au financement des guerres et génocides dans le monde. Les Principes de Nuremberg n’interdisent-ils pas toute forme de collaboration, directe ou indirecte, avec un “crime contre la paix, un crime de guerre, un crime contre l’humanité” ?
– J’endosse la dépossession des petits par les gros, je crée l’injustice sociale. Devant ce constat, mon âme m’interdit formellement de contribuer aux impôts. D’ailleurs, même chez les autorités, le message est ambivalent quant au comportement à adopter. C’est établi, il faut toujours obéir aveuglément aux ordres des autorités. Sauf que, parfois, il faut obéir à sa conscience plutôt qu’aux ordres des autorités…

Je suis consciente de la perturbation qu’occasionne, pour les systèmes établis, l’obéissance à mon ‘âme et conscience’. Peu importe le prix à payer, je demeure fidèle à mon ‘âme et conscience’. C’est elle qui gère ma vie et je lui ai donné carte blanche. Quelle que soit l’issue de cette aventure, je me réjouis de contribuer à l’évolution de la conscience humaine. Après tout, n’est-ce pas pour cela que je suis sur terre ?! ».
Ghislaine Lanctôt


7 July 2005 London bombings

We all know about “9/11 inside job attack” (see loose change)

But what about London 07/07/2005

The 7 July 2005 London bombings (also called the 7/7 bombings) were a series of coordinated bomb blasts that hit London’s public transport system during the morning rush hour. At 8:50 a.m., three bombs exploded within fifty seconds of each other on three London Underground trains. A fourth bomb exploded on a bus nearly an hour later at 9:47 a.m. in Tavistock Square. The bombings killed 52 commuters, injured 700, and caused disruption of the city’s transport system (severely for the first day) and the country’s mobile telecommunications infrastructure. The series of suicide-bomb explosions constituted the largest and deadliest terrorist attack on London’s transit system in its history.

Here is 2 documentary about it:



7/7 Ripple Effect

……Nothing about Madrid bombing 2004 yet……

bond de conscience

La fin de la peur

Une entrevue avec Ghislaine Lanctôt, Idéssique en Devenir . . .

PS: Le 3 avril 2008, soit une semaine après le tournage de cet entrevue, Ghislaine Lanctôt fût
arrêtée par deux membres de la Gendarmerie Royale du Canada.
Cette arrestation fait suite à un mandat d’arrestation prononcé contre elle le 3 mars 2008 pour avoir omis de se présenter à la Cour du Québec, à Granby.
Madame Lanctôt refuse de priduire ses déclarations d’impôts depuis maintenant 13 ans.
Refusant également de signer les conditions de remise en liberté lors de son passage à la Cour du Québec le 7 avril, Ghislaine Lanctôt fût conduite à la prison Tanguay de Montréal où elle demeure détenue jusqu’à la tenue de son procès, le 28 mai 2008.

Pour plus d’informations sur “Ghis”, un site:
je me souviens de qui je suis

About the current situation

Benjamin Fulford (9 September 2008)

Phone interview with Benjamin Fulford (MP3 link)

George Green (2 September 2008)

Conversation with George Green
(MP3 link)

The economy collapse


The history of the current financial crisis and what MUST be done avert doom.

L’histoire de la crise financière actuelle et ce qu’il DOIT être fait pour éviter le carnage.


Money as debt

Where does money comes from? Is it available in limited quantities? Is it really the government that creates it? A lot of surprises and an obvious causality link with the current and indispensable need of economic growth. By Paul Grignon, 2006.


Une vidéo de Paul Grignon (2006), sous-titrée officieusement en français. Mais d’où vient donc l’argent ? Est-il présent en quantités limitées ? Est-ce bien le gouvernement qui le crée ? De grosses surprises sont au rendez-vous, dont un lien causal évident avec l’actuel et indispensable besoin de croissance économique continue …



The codex is something that wants to eradicate by making illegal all medicinal alternatives to their industrial trade system, (food supplement, naturopathy, chinese medecine, your grand mother’s recipe etc…)  and it will regulate the vitamins, minerals AND pesticides included in all the food available in the shops.

They decret we as human can survive with only 28 vitamins and they’ll allow 10 of the WORST chemicals (pesticides) known to man to be included in the food, whether on the GM fruits and vegetables or the hormones and anti-biotics they give to animals that make meat, milk and derivated products (milk, cheese, butter, fats etc etc…)

They unsuccessfully tried in 2005 to make it adopted globally, they will try again in december 2009.
Once into force, it will KILL 3 BILLIONS of Humans (half of the planet), 1 by starvation, 2 by malnutrition.

All this with the help of the World Health Organization / Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (WHO / OMS)

ha ha

Its part of the GLOBAL GENOCIDE that is being organised over the the last decades, which will be talked about in this blog.


[A talk by Dr Rima E Laibow about the Codex Alimentarius Commission.]



Here is a concise  text about the facts YOU NEED TO KNOW. For the big speech, go here


In a few words, the Codex Alimentarius is a set of rules in food, that was put forward by war criminal (WW2 gaz providers) released from jail in 1963, to “harmonize” ALL international food trade (worth $400 billions) by regulating ingredients (vitamins, minerals AND pesticides) in food.

It is obviously officially presented as health protection system for humans, animals and vegetation of a country that import food made in another country, a system that would help agricultors to trade better and finally help to end misery and hunger.  (see the result 40 years later).

Since 1950, the majority of our aliments lost 50% of its nutrients, and cancer increased 300%.

Behind its philantropic appearance, the Codex is merely an extension of a secular occult USA organisation whose secret vocation is total exploitation of mankind.

Its objectives are to outlaw all kind of alternative medecine related to vitamins, natural therapies, food complement or anything that sets itself as a concurrent. This state of mind that presides the pharma-chemicals industry largely explains the systematic destruction of independant scientific innovations for the last 50 years..

The dissidents who refuse to comply with the CA have to pay a hugefine. (ex: Europe currently pays every year $116.8 millions to refuse to import hormone-fed veal.)

The scientist’s revolutionnary discoveries in nutritional therapies (regardless of the secular medecine that is being almost totally wiped out) are not marketed by the pharmaceutical industry, they are discredited and considered as enemies as they constitue a threat to the “Disease Business”.

In 2002, euro deputies adopted laws in favour of the pharmaceutical industry that aimed at a regulation for all natural therapies and food supplements. 438 millions petition from citizens flooded the euro-deputies’s offices, but the laws were adopted whatsoever.
A real insult to democracy.
A legion pharma lobbyist are constantly influencing law makers to control regulating organisms, to manipulate medical research and education.

What the CA comity tried to put into law in 2005:

  1. Suppress all natural food supplement. All will be replaced by 28 synthesis products (low dose cause toxic) and will only be available in pharmacy with prescription.
  2. All alternative medecines such as acupuncture,  energetic, ayurvedic, tibetan medecine…  will become progressively forbidden.
  3. Agriculture and animal alimentation will be regulated according to the norms of the pharmaco-chemical complex, forbiding aswell the so-called bio-dynamic agriculture.
  4. The legally certified Human food  must be irradiated  (eg : Cobalt irradiated – the technique term used to reassure the population being « ionisated ».)

The Codex Alimentarius will control the access to essential aminated acid fish oils, vitamines and minerals. The controls expansion will operate progressively, slaying all alternative medecine, natural or ancestral.


11 septembre – LOOSE CHANGE en francais

loose change 2nd edition

La soi-disante contre enquête du 11 septembre, LOOSE CHANGE, sous-titré en Français.


L’excellent blog du directeur de Losse Change, est sur

Une autre version Francaise de la 2nde édition en meilleure qualité est hebergée sur

11 SEPTEMBER – 7 years later

loose change 2nd edition

The so-called best documentary on 911, give us a break one might say, but this nonsense has dramatically changed the world we live in, and it’s still shifting.



The excellent blog of the film maker, is on

A better quality video is also hosted on


flash news

925 millions (+75millions since 2007) of people in a state of starvation in the world. ——————————————————————-

vatican info 2008

925 millions (+75 millions depuis 2007) de personnes souffrant de famine dans le monde. ————————————————————————–

vatican info 2008